• GrimChaos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I liked Rick Moranis’s idea for it, Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II.

      I feel like you can modify it to include both ideas Spaceballs III: The Search for Spaceballs II: The Search for More Money

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Thanks-killing did that, skipped a sequal and the third film was about destroying the second (that dosent exist).

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’d have trouble fitting all the gags about repetition and nostalgia in a reasonable running time.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      They made that, it was just split into three movies and made by Disney, with different titles.

      Underwhelming too.

    • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Can we get Jews in space and Hitler on ice. I mean technically space balls was the former but what would be the latter.

  • KinNectar@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Constantine. Keanu Reeves has said he would like to do it, and there is a ton of story material to draw from between the Constantine series and all of the Hellblazers, not to mention cameos in other series.

  • Ixoid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Alita: Battle Angel. I’ve heard there is a sequel planned, but it’s been a few years since the first movie. James Cameron is still involved as a producer, but I guess his blue-skinned money machine has kept him busy lately.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      I read something about that a while ago. If I recall correctly, it was intended to be a franchise, but Master and Commander was so incredibly expensive that they decided against it.

    • planetaryprotection@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      In 2021 there was some planning/writing done for a prequel, but I don’t think anything came of it.

      That film is having a bit of a cultural comeback, so there’s still hope.

      • That’s good to hear. I haven’t read any of the books (not my preferred literary genre) so I didn’t have a preconception of the Aubrey character. This sadly left me loving Russell Crow as Aubrey, and I’ll have a hard time with anyone else playing him. Crow is 59, now; he might still be able to get away with it.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      And there’s a whole bunch of more books to be adapted. That movie was so perfectly done I wish it had worked enough to allow a whole series of sequels.

  • Nefara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Still waiting for the Zootopia sequel. Genuinely good and creative movie that used the format to talk about tricky topics with some cushion and then became a cult favorite. They added some extra stuff under Zootopia+, they tee’d up the buddy cop format, did all this world building and then… what, Disney, this is the one IP you’re not going to squeeze for all its worth? Where’s the next one?

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

    It was good. It was written by Douglas Adams. He also wrote screenplays for the next 2 books to be made into movies.

    And despite it making a couple million more than it cost, the first one was considered a flop. :(

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It was ok. Didn’t understand the side story with John Malkovich at all, pointless. And Zoey Deschanel was terrible as Trillen, like criminally awful at the role to the point she ruined it for me. Sam Rockwell was perfect casting though, same with mos Def and Martin Freeman

    • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thay movie was awful. As a huge fan of the series, I don’t know how anyone can watch it and understand the plot without being familiar with it beforehand.

      The BBC series is much better, and goes up to Book 3 iirc.

      • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I disagree. I loved the film. I remember it fondly.

        Do you like the books? I find that people who like or have read the books tend not to like the movie and vice versa. I do not like the books.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          The funny thing about THHGttG is that it exists several times simultaneously with wildly different canons. The original BBC radio show was the original, then they did the TV miniseries with much of the same talent (Mostly replacing Susan Sheridan with Sandra Dickenson as Trillian), THEN the book pentology, THEN the 2005 movie. They all start pretty similarly with Arthur’s house and the pub and the Vogons, but then they go into all kinds of different directions in different orders.

          • loobkoob@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            For me personally, the plot doesn’t matter all that much anyway. What I love is Douglas Adams’ prose - the plot’s mostly just a vehicle for that - and I feel that doesn’t really translate to film. The perfect example:

            The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don’t.

            It’s funny. It’s succinct. It’s very descriptive. It doesn’t just tell you that the ships were hovering, it draws comparison to bricks which conjures up images of blocky, inelegant ships, and it gives the impression that the way they’re just stationary in the sky is somewhat unsettling or surreal. I think it’s quite impressive how much such a short sentence manages to convey really!

            Translating it to film, and having shot of some blocky, inelegant ships hanging in the sky, doesn’t manage to capture the same humour or feeling that that short sentence in the book does, at least for me. And it’s the same throughout the whole series, but that line is probably the easiest example to bring up. Some books translate really well to film and the imagery in the film ends up being far better than what I could imagine myself on the fly, but that’s not the case with Hitchhiker’s Guide at all.

            The Hitchhiker’s Guide radio series has a fair amount of narration so the prose still shines through in that.

            I had similar issues with the various Dirk Gently adaptations, too. And I find I have the same issue with screen adaptations of Terry Pratchett’s work for similar reasons. Without Adams’ or Pratchett’s wonderful prose, it often tends to feel very B-movie-esque to me.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m surprised it’s never been made into a decent TV show. The entire thing has already been made into half-hour radio shows, so the scripts are there and road tested. It’s basically halfway done already.

  • Mokopa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 months ago

    Master and commander… They had the ship built already too - why not make a sequel? There’s about 20 books worth of material.

    • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I saw something on this that it was the last “great epic” type movie before Hollywood was run over by the MCU. Absolutely fantastic series of books, which translated well (IMO) in the movie, but…pew pew lazereye firerboys demigods won the day.

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pacific Rim, such a great fun mechs vs monsters movie that had a gritty feeling to it. Not over the top fantastical bullshit with flips or garish colors, just solid, slow, huge mechs fighting solid, slowish, sea monsters.

  • Ecksell@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    Man of Steel. It was a shot in the arm for DC movies, and the Superman character in film. Why they didnt follow up with a direct sequel, and instead released that dumpster fire Batman v Superman instead, I will never understand.

      • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You’d think after the second or third time they tried to skip a rung on the ladder and smacked their face in humiliation they would have learned. At least it seems they’ve learned now and put people who actually understand story in charge rather than people who just chase box office numbers.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I will forever be mad about that. I was defending Man of Steel, while others shit talked it. I thought it was a great beginning for a Superman franchise. Sure he killed Zod, but imagine how this will change Superman to never want to kill again? But they never went back to do a solo Superman movie. Poor Caville was shafted hard by WB suits who wanted their own Marvel franchise.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      DC tried launching into their own DCU way too fast. Whereas Marvel setup most of the major characters beforehand and let it simmer for a little bit before jumping into the ensemble movies, DC just tried jumping right into their cinematic universe. DC just can’t seem to do anything right when it comes to their movies unless by accident (or if it’s an animated movie). Maybe James Gunn will be able to turn it around and put together something cohesive, but it’s hard to tell where anything starts or stops with DC now, it just feels like a convoluted mess. Plus, the whole superhero movie trend may be dying out anyways thanks to Disney’s/Marvel’s lazy writing.

  • kreynen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Princess Bride

    I always thought a sequel where the roles are reversed and Fred Savage is reading to an ailing Peter Faulk would have been a great way to start a sequel.

    • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Really? The movie was the handout for the people who were pissed the series didn’t last longer. Asking for a second movie is a nonstarter, even if the first was good.

      • Brutticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which, honestly, to be 100 percent honest, it wasn’t. I hated the movie. I understand its my fatal flaw, but I look at works holistically. One of the things that got me into firefly was it’s pacing; the promise that everything was going to have room to breathe. I would rather just have the first season; the movie crammed plot threads and character arcs meant to sustain an entire 5 season series into a 2 hour movie. Except its worse, because I got to see what the slow burn was like.