• Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    You know that if China or Russia vetoed it the entire west would go on about how “China and Russia are blocking peace in Gaza”

    The plan as it is will never work and will hit massive road blocks, it will fall apart before it gets anywhere.

  • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Russia also circulated an alternative draft proposal and criticized the US one quite vocally for not actually offering a real solution. It is nonetheless frustrating that Russia and China are so reluctant to use their veto powers.

    • rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is an explanation regarding the veto circulating in a Cuban Telegram that I follow. Let me know your thoughts:

      🇷🇺🇨🇳🇵🇸 A lot of people are upset that China and Russia didn’t veto yesterday’s UN Security Council resolution. But that reaction is emotional, not strategic. Here’s the reality.

      Because the Palestinian Authority supported the resolution, Beijing and Moscow were not going to veto something the recognized Palestinian government itself endorsed. That’s the entire principle of multipolarity: respecting sovereignty, even when you disagree with the decision being made.

      And that’s exactly what China and Russia did. They honored the position of the Palestinian Authority, and they still made their objections clear by speaking out forcefully and abstaining. That abstention was not weakness; it was a very public, very deliberate protest.

      This is what sovereignty looks like. This is what a post-unipolar world looks like.

        • rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s the stepping stone to reach a socialist world. Think about the mass line and cadre line but in a worldwide scenario.

          The multipolar world is like the protests done through mass organization. Within the mass organization, you will find people with plenty of types of ideology but with a common and specific goal as we usually see with the pro palestinian protests. Not everyone in the pro palestinian protests are socialist, correct? Same case with the pro multipolar world and anti West countries.

          It is a simplification but that’s my perspective. Also this is why I think it is valuable to go through this stepping stone to defeat imperialism. With small but firm steps forward, we will reach our goal for socialism.

        • Lenins_Dumbbell@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, but at the end of the day, China continues to be consistent in its approach. They’ve made it clear that they won’t interfere in other countries’ matters for ideological reasons. They’re going to let capitalism’s contradictions do it’s thing and focus on its own development.

          It’s not my favourite approach but interfering in other countries’ domestic issues never works out. It just alienates a chunk of population that becomes rife for anti-communist radicalization.

          Russia has a lot of ties with Israel that they won’t break, especially with the fact that they’re at war with NATO.

          It’s a terrible situation all around for the Palestinians

          • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            It just alienates a chunk of population that becomes rife for anti-communist radicalization.

            With the psychological and intelligence capabilities of the United States, I strongly believe this is the reason they don’t try to meddle in the affairs of other nations.

      • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is from a server where they were having a discussion based on this report:

        But the leadership of the Palestinian people is Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority. They’re despised by Palestinians and are active Zionist collaborators. You can’t just say “well the PA are the Palestinian people’s government sooo” But the leadership of the Palestinian people is Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority. They’re despised by Palestinians and are active Zionist collaborators. You can’t just say “well the PA are the Palestinian people’s government sooo”

        Hamas rejected the proposal

        Also the Arab states are US client states haha

        This is what I mean ‘multipolarity’ literally abandons class politics

        You can’t take the Arab US client states, the Palestinian Authority (all of these the bourgeoisie or the comprador bourgeoisie who that are client states of imperialism and literally imposed dictatorships on the masses) and say they represent the Palestinian people

        That’s like saying Chile’s Pinochet government represented the Chilean people lol

        Did any of these states ask Hamas? Palestinian Islamic Jihad? The PFLP? The actual resistance who lead the actual liberation movement? No. 🤣

        And yes, you could argue that they are seen as terror groups so it’s risky to have actual diplomatic relations with them, but that does not make the Palestinian Authority legitimate

        • demerit@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Its been quite clear that the “new world order” china and russia want to do isnt “socialist world police force” but simply letting countries do their thing. This has a much higher likelihood of leading to socialism AND getting states to actually sign off on a non-american led world.

          Most of the global souths leadership is still capitalist in nature, only a few government actually do represent commonpeople.