• Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Oh gosh, I better be scared of posting here… wouldn’t want to be fash (in the eyes of tankies). :P Scared, not scared.

    Heck, even if the accusations have merit, I’d rather be Daryl Davis, than leave it to fester in a worsening echo chamber.

    Either way, “Cui bono?”

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        deleted by creator

        I wonder what that reply was…

        Oh, I see it in email notification…

        why would you want to be Daryl Davis? the heck?

        Because he reduces the number of KKK and Nazis in the world. As opposed to leaving them to their echo chamber of bigoted hate and worsening divisive strongman authoritarian genocidal racial-supremacist “solutions”. As already highlighted in the same sentence. I’m not sure how else to further clarify that point.

        Why was that questioned so? Is there something I’m missing about the Daryl Davis story? Or … LOL … are the accusations about MoG true? LOL Or just some passing misinterpretation? I’d still like to know.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          I got mixed up with Daryl Davis and David Duke, hence why I deleted my comment lol

          but yeah, go off on conspiracy mode dude to reply to a deleted comment

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    In general, shitting on other nobodies from social networks is weak sauce. It doesn’t look cool and interesting to new users. And it genuinely sucks to see a bunch of dorks jerking themselves off at how dumb you are, even if you’re right.

    But this community is lighthearted and cathartic. 🤪 I hope it stays this way. If they come visit, please be civil! There’s another person on the other side of the computers.

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Lol if you’re not defending communist dictators, you’re fascist?

    They truly are missing a few screws.

    • doben@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not defending communist dictators is unequal to drinking the cool aid in a nazi bar. You could do one without the other. You don‘t, tho.

        • doben@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, thanks, that’s why the comment exists. You are drinking the cool aid in a nazi bar. There’s no need to engage in this toxic community, just because you don’t like people that you (perceive) as defending communist dictators.

            • doben@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because chuckling with nazis is something I condemn in general, maybe you or others like to be aware of what’s happening, if you engage in this community. You chuckle with rightwingers, nazis, genocide deniers, fascists and naive people that don’t realise that. Which one are you?

              • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                7 days ago

                You keep calling people nazis like that’s your one “gotcha”, everything I hate is Nazi. You people crack me up, but commenting here is kinda breaking the 4th wall. It’s kinda weird.

                • doben@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  18
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I didn’t call anyone specific that (lately). But you seem fine with the kind of company you enjoy. I’m just saying stay away, if you don’t enjoy this kind of company. You enjoy chuckling with nazis, that’s regrettable, but your choice.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    There is one reason I’m here and one reason alone. And that is because Lemmy.ml and allied instances refuse to allow open discussion and criticism of their ideas there. So we have to find another space for it. I suspect I’m not alone.

    Want to decrease the popularity of this community? Stop enforcing wrongthink and allow people to discuss your ideas openly. I guarantee you this com would quickly dwindle.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s exactly it. I disagree with a lot of people in this community. I also disagree with a lot of people on lemmy.ml and the like. The difference is that here at least I can disagree without immediately being banned. It’s great that the fediverse allows diversity of thought between different instances, but internally each instance is structured as its own little fiefdom, and lemmy.ml has some questionable leadership.

  • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sad that MotG is active and popular?

    That’s like a republican being upset that Leopards Ate My Face is too busy.

    Do they not understand how the material is generated?

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Cryptofash”, “fashy” 🤔

    Feels like bastardizations of already bastardized words, and I wonder if they’re using it to try to sound impactful while not saying much.

    • xep@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Remarkably, it’s not that much harder to type Cryptofascist than it is to type Cryptofash. What is a Crypto-fascist, btw?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      thats the same thing conservative used. they used things like shitlibs as tankies, or libtards as conservative exact same messaging.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Reminds of other conflationary contortions ; other contortions conflating different political philosophies.

        I’m in favour of greater nuance and more dimensions, more clarity in mapping out political philosophies. Such refinement in the search for truth furthers having a fully informed public, necessary for (genuine) democracy (even “representative democracy” (in its best imagined ideal)), and seems only those opposed to democracy and freedom of each and all are in favour of such Orwellianisms. Authoritarians. Tsk tsk. Emperor’s new cloak just aint there. Yay. Here’s to more seeing it.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ah yes, of course the people who would have been allies with the Nazis up until the moment Hitler ate their face, the people who looked at Project 2025 and said “still better than Kamala though”, the people supporting extreme authoritarianism and proving horsehoe theory correct… those people want to throw the word “fascist” around 🤣

      • illi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        I hate it because all they achieved is making the word mean nothing. I everyone is calling the other fascist, then it is that much harder to call out actual fascists.

          • illi@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 days ago

            I don’t mean it’s hard to actually say it - but the word gets diluted. And when yo do call out a fascist, it may not carry the weught it should because it is used by tankies or actual fascists as a word for someone who disagrees with them.

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Yup.

              "Beware the name changers."1

              (…and the definition changers)

              Beware the name changers. --Andy Crouch

              1 Have heard that expression for decades… just now looked up who it’s attributed to… Andy Crouch, says the websearch’s LLM summary… and a quick glance at another LLM’s summary of his political philosophy does intrigue… E.g. “Crouch redefines power not as domination or control, but as the ability to create and introduce new cultural goods. He argues that power, when exercised properly, should be generative and life-giving, rather than oppressive or self-serving.” One to look into more.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Oh so they didn’t ally with Hitler, huh? 🤔 Dummy. Consider following your own advice.

          Welcome to the blocklist lol

          EDIT: also like, rightfully so that they were denied. The allies can be proud that they told bullshitters responsible for the worst attrocities in all of human history to fuck off. Genuinely the correct decision.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Just FYI. That’s a no life troll. The acct will be abandoned tomorrow. And they will still have no life.

            • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              No worries, I just instablock em. But yeah, it is more sad than anything when you think about the person behind the screen.

              “ItS tHe AlLiEs FaUlT wE BuDdIeD uP wItH hItLeR” is pretty hilarious though

    • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      One of the most important tasks in any propaganda framework is defining the words appropriately.

      In particular, the word for “enemy” needs to be carefully chosen.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Some of the worst tankies on Threadi (that lack humanity and behave in the most regressive way possible) in that screenshot.

    Also funny how US-centric they are with their use of chud terminology. The vile pro-authoritarians can’t even imagine a world outside of their US-style fake commie online roleplay.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’d prefer it if it were possible to kick these chuds off the fediverse entirely

    And they still don’t see who they are…

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      also apparently like one post every few days is considered popular by tankie standards. geez dude

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You have been banned from the DPRK. Glorious leader has spoken.

      Cowbee loves to act like he’s not in an echo chamber. All the tankies like him are just currently unemployed dictators. They’re like the people who simp for billionaires…just they do it hoping that they’ll be in charge when “communism” comes around.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        a comment on reddit on a sub recently about voters, and they said tankies(i assume the leftist) dont come out in vote in elections, they just whine and bitch behind the screens, and give excuses. for terrible as they are , conservatives at least come in droves to vote all the time. ,most of the time.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          thats why tankies and their sort will always fail.

          they’re just too cowardly to actually do anything.

        • narp@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          [US election 2020: Sanders ‘told of Russian effort to aid his campaign’

          ](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51582025)

          My guess is a lot of them don’t live in the US and/or are russian state actors. Putin is playing “divide and conquer” since quite a while now.
          That’s how you get the impression of high online support and low voting results.

          But please don’t call them “leftist”. Support of Russia and China is authoritarian, the “horseshoe-theorie” is BS. The only thing the left and the right have in common is that they are both heavily targeted by russian propaganda and that’s how you get tankies. The best way to think about them is as Russian state propagandist infiltrating left parties to use them for their goals.
          (In germany the left party split exactly because of this so now there is a pro Putin “left” (BSW) and right (AfD) Party)

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oh lord. And I thought the right wing chuds were kings of projection. These people genuinely live in an alternate reality. It’s equal parts fascinating, sad, and disturbing.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Oh lord. And I thought the right wing chuds were kings of projection. These people genuinely live in an alternate reality.

      Had my first back-and-forth with one of such ilk a few weeks back… Was quite the exercise in attempting to speak reason to the obviously unreasonable and deceitful. How much was just being lost to an alternative reality? I don’t know. But it wasn’t all of it. The stench of disingenuous strategy was strong. Unshakeable presumption of having the one true way, and the ends justifying any means. Totalitarianised psyche, where any and all atrocities are seen as necessary virtues. Strong suspicion of narcissism too, in the absence of introspection, the gaslighting, projection, and inner fragility triggering ad-hominem attacks from logical critiques of their arguments, taken as threats to them, inducing reflexive social domination mode, and worsening loss of critical thinking. So [regarding being lost to an alternative reality] it’s not none either.

      It’s equal parts fascinating, sad, and disturbing.

      Yup.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think it’s more that a genuinely leftist movement in Russia was captured and subjugated by authoritarians and they spent 70 years muddying the waters about what leftism means with their powerful propaganda.

          • Glide@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            To be fair, this is largely why I discredit the left-right paradigm of politics. The graph adding authoritarian vs libertarian helps a bit, but it’s just too complex of a set of ideals to break into simple binaries.

            The .ml crew are genuinely leftists. They believe in the value of socialized systems and collective empowerment as opposed to individual merit. The problem is that they’re also authoritarian nutjobs who actively cover up and/or support the wholesale murder of out groups.

            Yes, there’s a decent argument that this isn’t true leftism, or a true belief in collective empowerment and the like, but that’s kind my point. Politics are too complicated for simplistic binaries. They carry a number of beliefs that are decidedly left, while simultaneously sharing far more beliefs than they’re willing to admit with the batshit insane nationalists that they claim to detest. They defend authoritarianism at every turn, while simultaneously speaking down to those they perceive as fascist. And not all of it - emphasis on “all”, as a good portion of it is - is as hypocritical as we’d like to believe. Our simplified political binaries just do a bad job of discussing complex ideologies.

            • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              They’re just nonexhaustive ways of describing ideologies according to considerations that don’t necessarily matter to you. The left–right spectrum originated from seating arrangements of the revolutionary French national assembly where the right favored conserving the traditional rule of church & feudal hierarchy and the left favored radical liberation from traditional hierarchies toward egalitarian rule, hence conservative right & liberal left. Alignment between social hierarchy & equality is not necessarily as relevant today or our top consideration.

              Each of us can choose more relevant considerations to evaluate ideologies. I personally consider unrestricted authority incredibly dangerous, so above all other considerations I prioritize the restriction of authority to protect fundamental liberties. While the pursuit of equality is good, any ideology that does so without limiting authority to protect fundamental liberties is entirely illegitimate & immoral to me. The ends do not justify the means.

              I’d argue that’s the main problem with tankies: immoral contempt for fundamental liberties.

            • blaue_Fledermaus@olio.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I completely agree. Here in Brazil there’s a great example of how badly these binaries fail with Getúlio Vargas.

              He got into power with the help of the fascists against the communists. But he was an ultranationalist and those were foreign ideologies, so he persecuted both.

              He instituted many workers’ rights and was called big father of the poor, but was also a cruel dictator who committed genocide against the natives, and also persecuted white Europeans who did not had Brazilian culture.

              After being deposed he got reelected and committed suicide in a way that saved Brazilian democracy from a military coup.

              • Glide@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                Fascinating. I’m embarrassingly uneducated on South American politics, though I’ve taught a few EAL learners from there. I appreciate the quick history lesson, genuinely.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, they’re conservatives. Their chosen ingroup just happens to be leftists. Same behavior, different markings.

        By contrast there are right-wingers who aren’t tribalists blindly performing loyalty. You can spot them as they get booted from their party for insisting on yesterday’s bullshit over today’s bullshit. They’re the schmucks who actually bought their side’s propaganda, never realizing it was only a disposable cudgel.