• Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      Of course you can run it on tubes, in principal, since they do the same as transistors at the end of the day

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m sure someone could figure out how to boot Linux on a vacuum tube computer. The problem is there just aren’t that many around that are still operational.

  • tetris11@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Shows image of a common NPN bipolar low power transistor

    You’re telling me that a Japanese (Nippon) person with wild mood swings and low self esteem who identifies as a trans sister, also runs Linux? How is this news.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Not quite just a transistor but maybe something like this (an SOC with 32MB ram which costs about $5 in bulk) though it does require quite a bit of additional electronics to work.

    Also somebody also made an embedded Linux for the ESP32-S3 (which is even cheaper and doesn’t require anywhere as much auxiliary electronics).

    PS: Yeah, I got the joke. Just pointing out that the reality itself is quite impressive.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      >Not quite
      >has about 1.5 million gates in the CPU alone
      >each gate is multiple transistors

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        funny thing - the SDRAM used provides 300kb/sec, while the SDcard used as storage provides 200kb/sec. Performancewise they could just skip most of the ram outside of booting and use the SDcard without losing much performance, especially since the SDRAM needs to be refreshed every 62ms for a duration of 3ms regardless of use.

        Edit: I LOVE this part:

        It takes about 2 hours to boot to bash prompt (“init=/bin/bash” kernel command line). Then 4 more hours to boot up the entire Ubuntu (“exec init” and then login). Starting X takes a lot longer. The effective emulated CPU speed is about 6.5KHz, which is on par with what you’d expect emulating a 32-bit CPU & MMU on a measly 8-bit micro. Curiously enough, once booted, the system is somewhat usable. You can type a command and get a reply within a minute. That is to say that you can, in fact, use it. I used it to day to format an SD card, for example. This is definitely not the fastest, but I think it may be the cheapest, slowest, simplest to hand assemble, lowest part count, and lowest-end Linux PC. The board is hand-soldered using wires, there is not even a requirement for a printed circuit board.

        6 hours to get into X is ridiculous

    • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Some crazy fucker got the OG Tomb Raider to run on an ESP chip.

      Although the ESP is significantly more powerful than the original console.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Well, as two people already pointed out, turns out somebody got Linux to run on the 8-bit ATMega1284p microcontroller which comes in a DIP package, though it’s 44 pin rather than 32.

      • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Gosh, his character as ‘himself’ on Arrested Development was so damn good. It gets me every time. I think I’m way past due for another rewatch; thanks for reminding me! This was also a wonderful usage of the reference and gif! :)

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Plot twist: it’s actually a whole SoC packaged to look like a single transistor, with the pins being for +V, ground, and a 1-Wire data bus.

      I don’t know that such a thing exists, but these days I bet it could.

    • WFH@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’re right. A lightbulb plugged into a potato is the real minimum system requirement.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Linux requires at least 32 bit machine words, and it always has. Linux was originally written for Intel 80386.

      Linux requires a hardware MMU to support virtual memory. There are patches that can make a no-MMU kernel, but it drastically changes the experience to do so.

      • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well it is kinda cheating but Linux does “run” on a intel 4004 running a MIPS emulator

        I think you could cook something like a 4-bit turing complete computer with around 100 transistors or so. And i guess turing completeness basically means “it will run with enough elbow grease” in this case

        (if we exclude memory from the transistor count…)

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This meme made me wonder what’s the minimum number of transistors needed to run linux

    • kibblebits@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I had an old Chromebook I converted to a Linux machine. It only had 16gb of disk space. It filled up surprisingly fast.

    • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      While I agree this is funny, if you even just install one flatpack like steam that is like 15+ gb by itself. A fairly comprehensive system with kde, gimp, blender office and more take up much less space.