• ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They might be nicer, but they won’t change their political views. Voters in Germany generally have their basic needs met (thanks to Art. 1 GG). Around 80% of them are still explicitly supporting right-wing political parties on the federal level, whose policies will leave most Germans poorer than they were before.

      The unfortunate reality is that a lot of people - even when they don’t want to say it - have an underlying belief in a hierarchy of “betters” and “others” that they want to uphold. And sadly, no amount of education has proven suitable to fix that.

    • TheShamMirrors@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I want to believe. Deep down I’m scared that some people’s nastiness comes from having too many of their needs met too quickly. And it deprives them of ever developing any empathy for others whose needs are not met.

      • chloroken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Oh, yeah, other peoples nastiness. Not your own, of course.

        What no theory does to a mfer.

      • Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s just about the basic needs here. Its actively damaging to develop without those being met. And even if it does make a few more assholes, this is still the point - here are some stupid assholes that deserve to be given the guarantee of survival

        • MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is what I don’t understand about anybody who disagrees with you. What is the point of the entire concept of society, of civilization, of government, of organizing people into any sort of group if not to raise the basic quality of living? If you don’t believe in the concept of a society, then fuck off and stop influencing and benefitting from the very thing that you’re trying to dismantle.

          Furthermore, not only is it the moral and ethical thing to do to take care of all of us, but it’s an investment that pays dividends because healthy and safe people become productive people who will in turn raise a generation of productive people and so on and so forth. So even if you’re a ghoul who lacks empathy and only looks at the bottom line, it still just makes sense to feed and educate and clothe and house the people. And even if you’re able to easily provide those basics for yourself and your family, that just means more expendable income to juice the economy when you buy the goods and services that you want instead of just spending it on needs.

          “Oh no, but then we’d get a ton of immigrants!” Okay? And what, we get a population boom of productive people just in time for boomers to retire and die? And that’s supposed to be bad? Kinda seems like an ideal solution.

          The only explanation that I can find is that these people are either too dumb to think that far ahead or they’re too cruel to want to end suffering for anybody that isn’t them. In both cases, I don’t know what the solution is, but they’re so plentiful that it’s hard to imagine a Star Trek utopian society ever coming to fruition. It’s hard to have hope for the future with so many bastards insisting that humanity has already peaked and we need to regress to improve.

          • Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            That’s not the only explanation. Our current era is dominated by a complete lack of political imagination, probably because most of the ruling class benefits from how things are (I guess that’s true by definition). And some of them can benefit even more if they redirect all the blame on an outgroup. It’s not stupidity when they are doing what is in their personal best interest and it’s not cruelty because Im not sure they think in the slightest about those they are hurting.

          • naught@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            you see the immigrants have scary values that differ from the nice white folk of america. they have a strong work ethic, prioritize family, speak english, and most importantly, have a slightly different skin tone which assaults the delicate anglo sensibilities upon which this great eugenicist experiment was founded

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think an uncomfortable percentage would gladly sacrifice their own needs being met to prevent certain others’ needs being met.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s probably a factor. But we can deal with that in ways that don’t need their needs to be unfulfilled.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago
      1. They’d take everything you give them

      2. They’d insult you for being stupid enough to give shit away for nothing

      3. they’d fight and steal amongst themselves for whatever they can get from each other

      4. they’d do everything they can to stop you

      5. they’d complain and demonize you for stopping.

      but MAYBE the kids they have that you’re feeding will grow up to be slightly less shitty.