Not only has Gov. Gavin Newsom vocally opposed the proposed California billionaire tax, but he also wants to prevent the state from ever passing a wealth tax in the future.

On Friday he endorsed Proposition 42, a ballot measure that would cancel out Proposition 40, the proposed billionaire tax. Prop. 42 would prohibit retroactive taxes like the one-time 5% tax on assets that would apply to any billionaire who lived in California on Jan. 1, 2026 if Prop. 40 passes.

But Prop. 42, funded and placed on the ballot by billionaire and Google co-founder Sergey Brin to defeat the billionaire tax, also would go further, by banning any new taxes on personal property.

That includes pensions and 401K accounts before retirees start drawing retirement income from them. It also includes other investments, financial assets, business holdings, art collections and all other forms of personal wealth that would be affected by the billionaire tax or any future wealth tax.

Newsom’s decision to support Prop. 42 runs counter to his own Democratic Party and some labor unions. It also aligns him with some of the wealthy tech donors with whom he’s maintained longstanding relationships dating back to his days as mayor of San Francisco.

  • cdf12345@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    I’m really hating this trend of passing laws to prevent any future regulations of things.

    Like the 10 years “you can’t touch AI” with your laws proposal.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I already didn’t like his policies if he runs for president, and need someone much better to win the primary.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        But it’s not. You can’t eat money, you can’t bring back an uninhabitable planet once you destroy it for pieces of paper. The things that are important, aren’t the things we are focusing on because we are a stupid species that’s going to destroy ourselves. And it will be peak irony.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You MUST vote for Him is we Make him the Presidential Nominee otherwise you HATE America!

    -Democrats CAMPAIGNING for Republicans in the Midterms!

  • nanometer1625@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bad choice, Newsom, especially considering we already have some wealth taxes, like the tax on real estate wealth. It’s not like wealth taxes are unprecedented. At least he’s not running again.

  • Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The proposition for a one-time tax on billionaires, while I hope it does pass, is not the most important prop in this regard. If for no reason other than it’s just a one-time tax. The counter-proposition to ban taxes on “personal property” i.e. wealth is far more impactful long term. We should be taxing wealth and not income. If that prop passes, California will never be able to tax wealth. And frankly I’m worried it will, because Americans just have this reflexive “taxes bad” ideology and will vote for it thinking it means the state will never be able to tax the $15k they have sitting in their Roth IRA or whatever.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This monetary obesity is due to shareholder externalized ownership. Since people who aren’t stakeholders can own the capital of a firm, all the responsibility and externalities are externalized from them. We need direct stakeholder ownership. Anyone who is a worker, consumer, and environmentally impacted by a firm needs to have shared ownership over its operations at whatever level need. We need coöperative ownership. We need a coöp commonwealth!

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We need both, these are complementary and compounding ideas. Tolerating a coöp, or its constituent members, hoarding of wealth would lead to similar perversion of social power dynamics.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Newsom is a piece of shit, and our next dem candidate, that most of you will browbeat us into pretending he’s cool. Right before he changes nothing and hands it back to the republicans.

    Because he’s the uniparty, he’s of the oligarchy, he is the oligarchy. Fuck this guy.

    • Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Worse he right of Regan and base on his veto and his guest on his podcast by time the Dems shove him down our throats only difference will be from Trump will be his age. The Democrats love moving futher right every single time.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No fucking way Newsom get put up at this point, even by the corrupt corpo dems

      • Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh he will the Democratic party have chosen thier candidate he been the choice for long time. They run primary and Harris be there and they might even run Hillary. Then they sprinkle in some moderates like oh Pete Buttigieg, just to make you think you have choices. If AOC runs then they throe Elizabeth Warren just to make sure it spilts that vote. Regardless Newsome will win the primary and he be a Blue Maga. Look how they already sabotaging their campaigns by abandoning trans people.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ha ha, you have a lot to learn about just how much the democratic establishment eats corporate dick. He is the frontrunner, make no mistake.

        He could’ve stood up an taken the country in 2024 when we needed it, but he waited his turn, and now it’s his turn.

      • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They absolutely will put Newson up for president because he is one of their own.

        It’s not red ha blue anymore, it’s corporate dems vs nwo oligarchs.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In 2024 Pritzker would have been great.

        Now, we need a non rich asshole, (pritzker is a billionaire, hotel magnate,) and the person for the job, is the UAW Boss, Sean Fain. He can win.