• velma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Consider the camera angles here as well. The camera is shooting from slightly below which puts emphasis on her thighs and hips with the slight lens distortion.

    She’s definitely bigger than the majority of the women at my work, and they’re about normal weight. I’d put her at around a BMI of 25 or 174.5 lbs

    This is insane of you.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      Consider the camera angles here as well. The camera is shooting from slightly below which puts emphasis on her thighs and hips

      Fair enough, but that doesn’t explain why her face looks so puffy

      • velma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Her face isn’t even part of this conversation. You’re just rudely commenting on a woman’s body at this point.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I’m not the one who brought it up, I’m only disagreeing with an argument that was presented to me. The entire post hinges on an agreement that she is skinny. And yeah, the post is rude. I normally never comment on people’s body out of nowhere, and I never even cared about her weight in the first place.

          I don’t know how you can say “her face isn’t part of this conversation” when the conversation is about whether somebody looks skinny or not. You brought the camera angle argument up and her face is furthest from the camera, yet it’s still not the face of a skinny person.