I’m aware of the NCIS scenes, what else you guys got?

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    19 hours ago

    In episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy’s skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes that same rib twice in succession yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we, to believe that this is some sort of a, a magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    One that annoys me is “Oh, you can’t pay for your food, you work for the restaurant now till you’re paid off!”

    Getting past the absurd number of Labor Laws and Sanitation Regulations we’re violating with that set-up, in addition to how badly this is pissing off of the union if the restaurant happens to be unionized…

    Most modern restaurants have dish washing machines minimizing the need for bus boys.

    Additionally, there’s a little thing called job training that typically has to be done. You don’t just throw a mop at a guy and tell them to get to work, even if they’re experienced each place has their own way of doing things. It’s why it’s actually really hard to get fired in real life, laid off sure, but actually fired? Unless you’re just THAT incompetent… Cause these things take time and money.

    And because you didn’t do any training, all your deadbeat patron has to do is cut his hand trying to dry off a knife and he’s not only paid off, but he’s gonna own the fucking joint when his lawyer hears about this shit.

    So what DOES the establishment do? Well it depends, but the most common scenario I’ve heard is that they take some form of collateral until you come back another day to pay them, and that’s usually for a fancy restaurant. For most places though you’d pay before you even got your food making this a non-issue.

    That’s the most common one, there are some that are less common but still get on my nerves.

    It could make sense if it’s a long time ago when the population is much lower, there aren’t as many labor laws, but I think even by the 60’s this scenario would be bizarre if it actually happened. I could see it happening in modern day, but it’d have to be a very specific set of circumstances

    1. Easy Sex Change - Now the name for this might be somewhat dated because no one refers to it as a “Sex Change Operation” anymore, but I can’t think of a better name for it. Basically there’s this idea in fiction that you can just go into any hospital looking like Fred Flintstone, and come out the same day looking like Pamela Anderson in her prime.

    Medical Science does not work that way

    The Transgender Healthcare standards wouldn’t let it happen that quickly as you need doctor’s notes (Hell I’m Post-Op for the better half of a decade and I’m still trying to get a note for a purely cosmetic boob job)

    Doctors actually trained to do Genital Reconstruction Surgery are extremely rare, nearest one to me is three states away, and I’m not even sure he’s still alive because that was 8 years ago and he was older than dirt.

    Genital Reconstruction only changes what you’ve got going on down there, and until very recently wasn’t covered by most insurance. All the other changes? You have to do estrogen for years and hope for the best.

    The body can’t recover that quickly (I literally had to spend the better part of a morning learning how to walk again after being bedridden for two to three after that… till then my body was still healing and I was basically immobilized… also having to learn to pee was weird. Trust me you don’t wanna be in a situation where you really have to pee but literally don’t know how because the functionality of your genitals has been reversed.)

    Admittedly I’m seeing it less and less as the idea of transpeople existing is mainstream now, but from the perspective of a transwoman like myself it’s the trans equivalent of someone asking a homosexual male how they know which man’s penis will open up to accept the other’s.

    1. Ordering food at a doctor’s office - I’ve not seen this too often, but I have seen it more than once, which is enough to baffle me.

    2. The Death Card - I just want a script writer to do a scene where someone draws Death, gets super scared, has it explained to them that the card isn’t that bad. As it refers to death in a spiritual sense, meaning not the cessation of existence, but rather the continuous cycle of rebirth… So it’s actually referring to change… And then immediately they draw the Inverted Tower (Which actually does mean that you’re in for a bad time). I’m just surprised I haven’t seen this joke done before…

    Wait a second…

    Simpsons did it - https://youtu.be/M-dButYcv14

    Though to be fair, I think this is one everyone who isn’t in Hollywood knows at this point. But as someone who actually practices Tarot it is annoyed.

    1. The movie Clerks 2 - Look I love Kevin Smith, I think he does great work, I’m even one of the only people who love Clerks 3… but… I can’t just point to one thing in this film. Pretty much everything about Clerks 2 requires a lot of suspension of disbelief as it’s obvious that Kevin Smith is too rich in 2006 to know how fast food joints work at the time.

    The part where they close up to a Donkey Show definitely stands out, as chain franchised Fast Food restaurants are not only too busy for that to be plausible unlike a random gas station in the boonies (like in the first movie), but it’s 2006, while it’s not as common of a practice now, most McDonald’s/Taco Bells/Wendy’s of this era would have been 24 hours.

    1. Video Games in general - If movies are to be believed, video games now are basically the same as they were in the 70’s. Atari sound effects, high scores, limited lives, games having “levels”… When in reality games have moved on, most games don’t really test the player’s skill so much as tell you a story through in an interactive medium. So your progress isn’t really based in how many points you’re getting, but rather how far in the story you’ve gotten. Lives aren’t really a thing anymore for the simple fact that if your streaming platform gave you an overly tough quiz half-way through the movie about things you saw in previous scenes, and punished you by making you re-watch the whole thing up until you got to the quiz again. No one would watch movies ever again.

    Actually it’s become a bit of a problem for the market as too many gamers are becoming annoyed that games are too much like movies funnily enough…

    Now Mobile games play more like classic arcade games, sure… but in movies they’re clearly playing consoles. Heck even re-releases of games that did have limited lives and a scoring system (Sonic Origins for example) took them out of newer games.

    In the early 2000’s, sure I guess I can buy that. Gaming was a niche hobby, good to dumb it down I guess. But nowdays it’s considered weirder to not play games than to play them, so I don’t know how this mistake keeps getting made.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if my grandmother had a fucking Steam account to play TF2 Themed Solitaire on. Because the oldest guy in my writing group has one to play Civilization and he’s fucking 80.

    1. Ditching a cop - In movies if you get in trouble and police are after you, just run away! You’ll ditch them and whatever you did will be forgotten up. In reality: Warrants for arrest exist, the charge for resisting arrest exists, and so do body cams… So, no, not really.

    My final one is

    The Monitor is the computer! The tower is just decoration! - But, this cliche has vanished thanks to computer use becoming more common.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Two people draw guns in each other’s faces point blank but nobody fires. Instead they have a tense conversation.

    Talkin’ to you, Malcolm Reynolds and Saffron (or Yolanda or Bridget or whatever).

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There’s a trillion ones around unrealism, so I may as well pick something that would be more enjoyable if fixed.

    Professional chatter. Let’s say a team of 30 scientists have been trying to communicate with a dimensional portal for 5 years. They wouldn’t be using speech like “Identity verified. Doctor Faris, you are clear to approach the anomaly.” Often, they’d have extremely abbreviated lingo for everything they need to express that happens on a daily basis, and otherwise are chatting about other stuff.

    “Ok, approach endorsed. Bob wasn’t so chatty yesterday from what I heard, we’ll just aim for 2 logic points for this cycle.”
    “Ryan was suggesting we spread the cycles. Bob has to sleep sometime.”
    “Yeah, 90% of us would rather listen to Ryan than Mick, but Mick signs the checks.”

    So the only actual order comes from some obscure phrase like “Approach endorsed”, which they may only say verbatim for safety reasons. The rest is just workplace banter about how best to accomplish their task, none of it being essential. EDIT: And, to make clear, in the above quote, Bob is the portal/anomaly.

  • trslim@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always think its funny how bullets never seem to penetrate anything in movies. Like, guy hiding behind a barrel? Nope, cant penetrate, even with a rifle. The newest Batman movie had me shaking my head as he shrugged off multiple rifle rounds to his armor.

    Bullets are insanely dangerous and powerful. A .223 round can penetrate a solid brick wall pretty easily, and can destroy a cinderblock wall with some effort. Even if it doesnt penetrate, the amount of force applied is incredible. Plates designed to stop bullets have to be made in specific ways to make sure a bullet doesn’t penetrate, but even with that plate, the sheer force of an impact can break bones.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    In Iron Claw there is a scene where Kevin was training Mike how to do a head lock and kept yelling at him about his footing and telling him how he needed to switch his feet so that his left leg was forward and not his right. But your right is supposed to be in front Mke was doing it correctly.

    Plus all the other historic inaccuracies and whitewashing hat no normal person cares about.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I just fired a gun right next to your head, neither of us was wearing ear protection, and now we’re having a conversation at normal volume and we can understand each other just fine.

    Bonus points for grenades going off indoors, and nobody having a concussion after.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I fired an assault rifle in the army without hearing protection once just so try how loud it was. No need to try that one again. I knew it’s going to be loud but not that loud.

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Just an fyi for those that seem to think otherwise.

      A .38 fired too close, not even next to, you when you don’t have hearing protection can cause temporary total hearing loss and lifetime hearing loss that amounts to a disability.

      Also hearing loss can be a strong influence on getting severe depression.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I think there’s a scene in The Other Guys where Will Ferrell and another guy temporarily get deafened by the loudness of gunshots. Might be thinking of a different movie but it was funny, like “Holy SHIT that was loud!” “Whaat?”

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I was in a play once where we were going to fire a blank onstage, in a fairly small black box theatre. There were two options, a .22 and a .45 caliber blank. The .22 made a sharp CRACK that really shocked you. The .45 made a VWOOM sound that filled up the entire room and left you with the feeling of a wave of violent energy having just passed through your entire body.

      We went with the .22.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hey, but it had a silencer on it, which is absolutely what it’s called, and makes the shots super quiet so they won’t be heard by people in the next room!

    • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on the gun. 9mm would be a normal conversation, 50. cal by the being shot close to your head with no hearing protection hurts

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        9mm would be a normal conversation

        Right after it being fired right next to your head? With no ear protection?

        Permanent hearing loss aside, I’d probably have a few very harsh words for the idiot firing irresponsibly rather than a “normal conversation” 🙄

        • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’ve shot and been around the shooting of easily of 1 million rounds. 9mm isn’t loud, especially in comparison.

          Yeah, good point, gun safety is very Important. Guns aren’t toys.

          • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Congratulations on your hearing damage making things seem quiet? I’ve had somewhat fewer rounds, maybe 100k-200k, and 9mm is still deafeningly loud. I’m betting it’s because I wore hearing protection for most of it…

            For god’s sakes, a simple internet search immediately shows the lack of evidence for 9mm being quiet.

            Yeah, good point, gun safety is very Important. Guns aren’t toys.

            • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              I haven’t shot that much, but I’ve found pistols to be louder than smaller rifles - probably because the barrels are shorter and they’re a fair bit closer to your face.

              • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                I have the same experience, generally. It will definitely have a lot of room to wiggle around, depending on the particular gun’s characteristics, the bullet’s characteristics, and even the surrounding environment. If you read the wikipedia on it, you’ll even see a section complaining about how measured dB levels are nearly useless if the distance from the source isn’t measured. A lawn mower across the street isn’t such a big deal, but the one pushing it should have hearing protection.

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              You are correct, and that guy doesn’t know he’s deaf I guess. All pistols are loud enough to hurt your ears if your ears are normal. Even a .22LR pistol with a 6" target barrel is pretty loud to the naked ear.

          • Fox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve shot a few thousand rounds. 9mm is very loud. Shoot it in a closed space just once without earpro and you will cause permanent damage to your hearing.

            I don’t think a million round sample size would help you in judging this.

              • Fox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 day ago

                You realize it’s a function of distance and that function is logarithmic, right? A gunshot at one foot is a hundred times louder than it is at 20 feet. If you were exposed to a million gunshots of any caliber from a foot away, you would be profoundly deaf.

                • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  This is the most blantantly ignorant comment I’ve read on Lemmy. No one would assume that every single shot was shot close to my head.

                  That being said, yes, most living adults understand how sound works.

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Think it just varies by rounds/gun and surroundings. I’ve had 9mm’s be quite quiet, but I had a Walther PK380 that would make my ears ring in a field without protection. It’s a smaller round than a 9mm… So never understood why.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’ll just add to this, 9mm, or any handgun really, is still very loud. The reason it doesn’t seem as loud is because when most people are shooting there are two main things happening.

        1. They’re behind the barrel, normally this doesn’t matter much, but the sound is at least a little directional, so being in front of it is going to make it sound much louder because you’re hearing the initial explosion, not an echo.
        2. Most people aren’t shooting it in their house, they’re at a gun range. The space in front of you at the range allows for the sound to travel and the pressure to spread through the room, slightly reducing the impact of the sound. Shoot one in a tiny room and it’s going to be much worse for you.

        Again it’s still really loud, but the context of where the sound is being made does make a difference. Obviously larger rounds will be louder, but that doesn’t mean rounds like 9mm are safe for your ears at all.

  • mPony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    How night and day work above the Arctic Circle.

    Movies and TV and stories talk about how there’s 6 months of daylight and 6 months of darkness. That does not fucking happen. This is still part of storytelling to this day (I’m looking at you, Sweet Tooth season 3).

    Days get stupidly long in the summer, and there’s a while where the sun really doesn’t go down. in the Winter days get stupidly short, and there’s a while where it doesn’t really come up all that much. But it’s not 6 months of one and 6 months of the other.

    (edited for clarity)

      • The farther beyond the arctic/antarctic circle you go, the longer the period of continuous night and day. Just above the circle it’s like one day where the sun is up at midnight, barely. At the pole, it’s quite a while.

    • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a few movies that get it mostly right. Wasn’t it the entire plot of the movie 30 days of darkness? I think it was still too light in those last days depicted before darkness fell.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I long for the days where movies would tell you it’s night time but still actually keep it light enough that you can, y’know watch the movie

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      (I’m looking at you, Sweet Tooth season 3).

      Tell me about it. And sunsets aren’t from a bright day to a dark night. During winter “days” are permanent twilight, the sun being very very low all the time it’s above the horizon, and during the summer, “nights” are dim because the sun is never that far below the horizon.

      Sweet Tooth had pretty much a countdown iirc. And then it went from 100% daylight to complete darkness in seconds.

      edit also i’m annoyed when people don’t wear hats in the cold but iirc in Sweet Tooth they had pretty good winterclothing most of the time idk.

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Half year day, half year night only really holds on the poles I guess. And it goes paired with a long twilight in between.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had to read that 2-3 times before I could comprehend that the base was not on top of ice and falling through it.

      Yeah…

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      That got me upset enough that when I read “GI Joe movie” in your comment, it was the first thing I thought of, before reading the rest of your comment.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Basically searched through the comments for this one. I knew it would be here. I know there’s a lot of “movie logic” for hacking, space flight, how guns work, etc. but how do you fuck up elementary physics? Even kids know ice floats.

    • snf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Cartoon GI Joe or live action GI Joe? I’m inclined to cut cartoons in general a lot of slack in terms of physics abuse

  • forrgott@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In movies when there’s a huge explosion in space, there’s always this ring that comes out from the explosion. No!

    In space the blast wave would be spherical: it only looks like a 2d ring when observed from a telescope many many light years away, since the telescope can only pick up the outside edge of the blast.

    Edit: fixed auto-incorrect

    • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember very vividly when they redid the special effects in the original Star Wars trilogy and added this dumbass ring coming out of the Death Star explosion. It completely broke immersion for me because I was like “wtf is that supposed to be?”

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        You could make an argument that there was some kind of huge spinning gyroscope reaction wheel system on that axis which projected the explosion that way.

        But we all know there wasn’t.

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My thought is that it’s revealing the construction and weak points of the death star. It may have been constructed in two hemispheres that were joined together, and that seam might have been the failure point where gassed were released when the internal pressure got too high.

          Except then we should see the two hemispheres blow out from each other a bit, which they don’t.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            All in all, the film makers had many things they could choose to make the effect look plausible, but they didn’t.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, it might have made sense if it lined up with the equatorial channel that the death star has. If the inside was exploding and that was the weakest area, material would be ejected out the ring first before the rest of the structure exploded. That might, indeed cause a ring effect. But in this scene the ring is going vertically, not horizontally. So yea, doesn’t make much sense.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Hell, in Star Trek VI, where the Praxis Effect originates, it’s a horrifying industrial accident that blows up Praxis, so for all we know there might well have been some kind of moon-sized particle accelerator that blew up and did cause that ring shape. But it seems to show up in a lot of places where there’s not as justifiable an excuse.

  • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Boffins coming up with a magical new solution to a problem that they somehow know will 100% work despite having done zero experimentation or testing.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      One plot point I liked of Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind. The Tolmekians are growing a Warrior. Enemies are on the way. Their princess orders them to unleash the Warrior. Her second says it’s not ready. She ignores him, it’s sent out. It’s not ready, and melts almost immediately.

    • pfm@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is so common to see anywhere - media, movies… It’s the libertarian “self-made man” myth I guess.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    2 days ago

    If a girl doesn’t like you, but you just keep pursuing her, everything will eventually work out and you’ll be happy together.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Ya know, it kinda makes sense that Hollywood is full of sex criminals when you look at romantic comedies and are always left wondering “And he’s not in jail why?”

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It worked for a friend of mine. They were friends, he kept trying to get her to date him and after a year of pestering she caved. They’re engaged now.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        not making any claims about your friend’s situation, but i’ve seen this happen more than once also–pestering, caving, engagement-- and they ended very badly.

        getting engaged or even married does not necessarily mean “happy together”

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You just got to wear them down enough, break their willpower. They can learn to love in time.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Uhm, it kinda happened for me, I felt that this girl liked me but she said no the first time. I stuck around, as we were in the same group of friends, and after a while she changed her mind. We’ve been together for over a decade.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Kinda happened for me and I’m the girl in the situation! I had a guy who was creepily obsessed with me and would threaten to hurt himself all the time if he didn’t get his way. He even showed up at my house uninvited once and he always kept insisting we were dating. I kept telling him we were just friends at best, that’s it, but he’d freak out, insist we were lovers, and have a panic attack. Eventually he’d forget all about it and just pretend I never said anything.

        I didn’t call the cops because I’m honestly afraid of the police more than him at this point. (The police in this town are as stupid as they are accusatory sadly)

        It has a weirdly happy ending. Eventually I just lost all patience and gave him the number for a therapist. He actually went, he realized I was afraid of him.

        My plan was to finally “Break up with him” for REAL this time after a therapist set him straight.

        He broke down in tears realizing that he was never really my boyfriend, at first he called me heartless saying that it wasn’t fair that from his perspective I had punished him for seeking out therapy I told him to get.

        After he calmed down we hung out for a bit, but… then we actually stared dating because it turned out that with his meds keeping him stable he’s actually a wonderful person that I get along well with and I actually DO love him. My family has even pretty much accepted him as part of the fold with my mother saying that it’s like she’s gained a son all of a sudden.

        We just spent Halloween together and watched Fritz The Cat while high on shrooms and eating candy, being super lovey dovey with each other and talking about the 70’s…

        Life is strange.

        I doubt it happens like this for most people.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There’s an entire genre of tiktok videos out there of women saying things like “So this guy I like asked me out, and I said no, and he was like okay bye and just walked away. What is with men not pursuing women anymore?”

        Hmm what was that hashtag popular a few years ago? #nomeanskeepgoing?

        “No means no” they said. Meanwhile in this very thread: “I’m actually in love with the guy that stalked me.”

        If you want no to mean no, you have to say different things when you mean something other than no. If you want to play hard to get, A) don’t, you suck at it and B) maybe let him know that’s the game you’re playing so he’ll actually try hard to get you instead of just taking a flat rejection at face value; ie don’t just say “no” say “You’ll have to try harder than that” or something that indicates you are open to further attention. What saying “no” when you actually mean “try harder” accomplishes is you filter out the guys who take no for an answer leaving your dating pool only filled with the men who don’t really care that much about consent.

        As for the “I turned him down becuase I wasn’t interested in him, then we actually talked and turned out I actually like the guy” story…I guess maybe try actually talking to guys? Even if you don’t cream your gusset at first sight?

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unfortunately, this one goes both ways. Some women feel like they need to play hard to get, because otherwise they’re sluts, and also they want to know that a guy really likes her. It’s self defeating of course, on both sides.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I watched Reality Bites as a teenager, and I’m convinced it had a negative influence on my life.
        The character Ethan Hawke played became my role model, and he’s just not a very good one, at all.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 day ago

    When someone’s falling hundreds of feet and when they’re inches from the ground a super hero swoops in from the side to grab them.

    Sure, they didn’t hit the ground but not only did you catching them slow down their vertical velocity just as fast as the ground would have, now you’ve accelerated them horizontally so fast that they’re now twice as dead as they would’ve been otherwise

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    2 days ago

    This happens with fire sprinklers a lot, one sprinkler goes off, and triggers the rest of the floor, or sometimes even building.

    That’s not how it works. Each sprinkler has it’s own trigger mechanism, the glass bulb, and cannot trigger another sprinkler.

    There are systems where this happens, but the sprinkler heads look very different, and you won’t find them in an office building.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Also I’ve heard that the water that first comes out of those sprinklers is RANK from having sat in the pipes for years

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. A combination of rust, thread cutting oil, and water that has been in the pipes often since the system was filled. It smells, it will stain anything it touches, and it’s a smell that’s difficult to remove.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not true everywhere. Many buildings, especially industrial, require a flush of the fire suppression system annually or biannually to test that everything is still functional.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s to test the incoming main, the actual grid on the floor doesn’t get flushed. There’s a lot of dead end pipes that can’t be flushed.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Once I turned a suspicious faucet I shouldn’t have and got a blast of this in the face.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Theoretically the water hammer effect might be able to break that glass, but I think it’s unlikely.

      • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t think water hammer would apply because there’s no abrupt cutoff or change in direction of the flow.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    1 day ago

    A more mundane one, but people on reasonably normal incomes living in a house that’s at least one order of magnitude more expensive than they could ever afford even if they purchased it twenty or thirty years ago. Its particularly bad in things set in expensive areas like London or New York or Tokyo. Like being able to afford a house in central London rather than renting a flat with three other people takes substantial money, you aren’t going to be afford that if you work in a supermarket.

    • Dragon "Rider"(drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The apartment in Friends is rent controlled and leased by Monica’s dead grandma. She’s been committing fraud for years to keep the apartment affordable.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      There was an old meme about house-hunting reality shows that was like, “David sharpens colored pencils for a living and Kirstin volunteers 2 days a week at the butterfly museum. Their budget is two million.”

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d love if in one of those shows it’s just implied lightly throughout the entire thing that they are squatting in the home of someone who died and the city never noticed or something stupid like that XD

      • LetKCater2U@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That kinda happens in Friends. Monica is living in her grandmother’s rent controlled apartment in the village. And still had a roommate!

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You’re telling me a waitress in New York City can’t afford a penthouse apartment and have a comedically unlimited food budget?

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      How the fuck does Bundy own a palacial 2 story + basement suburban mansion on the salary of an incompetent shoe salesman in a store that gets almost no customers!

      • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        He probably bought it in the 70s when he had no kids and his salary was higher, compared to the 80s and 90s with inflation, but the same salary.

    • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The apartment in Big Daddy was awesome and I was like ain’t no way Adam Sandler’s character can afford that!

    • jenny_ball@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Everyone lives in amazing homes in movies and they all have amazing jobs like director of the cia at like 25 years old and they do a lot of work while walking quickly down the hallways barking instructions to their assistants on their sides.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hey, if you got the property mortgage-free from your parents, all you have to pay is taxes. The taxes/insurance on a property like that would still be high, but not unreasonable for someone working full time, especially if they don’t have to worry about a mortgage.