• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    We have no fucking time. They told us, explicitly, what they were going to do.

    Any halfway decent opposition party would have already had responses ready for each and every one of the executive orders that have been signed

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Translation: “We need time to figure out a way to look like we’re doing something without risking actually changing anything.”

    If we’re not careful, we might accidentally do something that the voters like but that our owners don’t approve of.

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    You’ve had 8 years, 4 of which you had control of the white house. You’ve had enough time. You squandered it. Are you really going to do anything useful with even more?

  • Fisherman75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well the republicans are in some kind of hyperfascist accelerationist mode so I’m not sure exactly how much time we have to give them.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      That dickhead got roasted for “concepts of a plan”, but just when you think the Democratic party can’t get any more pathetic they go and show how hopeless they are. AOC needs to break and start a party with Bernie.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Spoiler alert: it will be “send us more money!”. That’s what they always settle on.

  • Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Personally, I don’t want to give Republicans an inch on their claims they care about national security after their pardons,” said Murphy, D-Conn. “My hope is that we’re going to be down on the floor and on TV and back in our states talking about the danger of these pardons.”

    At least there’s someone awake at the wheel

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve decided to rename the Democrat party to Republican Lite in order to appeal to more voters.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ideally people would have seriously punished Ford for letting that Nixon prick get off scot free and fought against the personality cult that was built up for Reagan, but if we’re talking about this century, the democrats should have come up with something as soon as the tea party lunatics got in position to kneecap public sector unions during the first Obama administration.

      It didn’t help that the occupy protesters were made to look like their message was a motley hodgepodge of pet causes with no real cohesiveness.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Democrats kept the filibuster around for this reason, right? They didn’t just keep it around to prevent progressive policy from passing, right?

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The second they try to use it, the republicans will nuke it, citing the precedent that the democrats did it first with lower court judicial nominees when they refused to let a single one pass, same way they did with scotus nominees when democrats dared to use it one time in protest against the stunt they pulled with Garland.

        Force Dems to reign in minority power the tiniest bit and use that as an excuse to remove minority powers entirely the second they’re in the majority is pretty standard Rep SOP now.