Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has criticized the Harris-Walz 2024 presidential campaign for playing it too “safe,” saying they should have held more in-person events and town halls.

In a Politico interview, Walz—known for labeling Trump and Vance as “weird”—blamed their cautious approach partly on the abbreviated 107-day campaign timeline after Harris became the nominee in August.

Using football terminology, he said Democrats were in a “prevent defense” when “we never had anything to lose, because I don’t think we were ever ahead.”

While acknowledging his share of responsibility for the loss, Walz is returning to the national spotlight and didn’t rule out a 2028 presidential run, saying, “I’m not saying no.”

  • MooseyMoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gee who would have thought that completely ignoring the anti-war/genocide crowd and courting the CHENEYS “moderate Republicans” while keeping absolutely silent about Medicare for all and touting a “keep America lethal” platform would have backfired for one of the least popular politicians ever who was just anointed as the presidential candidate without any sort of primary at all. I’m so confused!

  • Flummoxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe they should copy what Bernie Sanders is doing. He’s not even running and packing out town hall meetings. Who knew being against oligarchs, authoritarians, corporate cronyism and for the middle class would appeal to people?

  • NovaOG@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    People on the left screamed this as soon as they took over from sleeping baby joe. We said “PLEASE put some OOMPH into it! Stop regurgitating Corporate Dems platitudes!”

  • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am convinced 'Murica generally is too racist to vote a black person into office. Obama was only voted into office because he is an extremely charismatic and charming person. So much so that he was voted into office in spite of being black. Kamala is neither charismatic nor charming. Also, there is sexism and she’s a woman.

  • bradd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Easy to say when it’s all over, but I still think they’re wrong.

    They should try not being fake as fuck.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay Walz, that’s a start, but we’ve yet to see you go hard. Step it up or get out of Al Green’s way and let him cane the fuck outta these Nazi shitheads.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Surely the Democrats will stop moving to the center now that they understand that they weren’t properly addressing the needs of the people… right? right?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its just white noise. If you went back two months and addressed the KHive / Bidenbro block that was fanatically endorsing this campaign, does anyone seriously think “soft” or “safe” would be a term they’d use to describe the media appearances or the ground game?

      No, of course not! Harris was Girl Boss. Cheeto Mussolini was the weak one. JD Vance was too busy fucking couches to answer the hard questions like “Why do you enjoy sucking Putin’s cock?” and “Why do you enjoy sucking Elon Musk’s cock?” and “Why do you enjoy sucking Peter Thiel’s cock?”

      Meanwhile, Harris was out there punching illegal immigrants. She was making those effeminate cop-hating LGBTers eat Terf. She was out there dropping Facts And Logic on those stupid Iran-loving antisemetic ISIS students. She was bringing out the big guns with Liz Fucking Cheney and making sure every voter knew that America First A#1 City On A Hill sound of F-35s flying overhead we’re going to Beat Russia and Obliterate China and Nuke Far-Right Islamic Hate.

      Nobody thought the campaign was “soft” in October of 2024. They were priding themselves on their BlueMAGA credentials.

      Its only after they lost that we got to retcon the campaign as too squishy and liberal and egalitarian. Maybe next time they’ll bomb Dearborn Michigan or stage a full invasion of Tiajuana to prove they’re serious about being the most reactionary party in America.

      • TheresNodiee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m reading his “safe” comment in a bit of a different light. The Harris campaign was playing “safe” politics by ooh rah-ing about the military, guns, and the border. By throwing their full support behind Israel and shouting down and cutting out concerned for the Palestinian people. By running around with Liz Cheney.

        Their campaign started off strong. Kamala was brat, Walz was calling Trump and his allies weird and joking about Vance fucking his couch. There was energy but they dropped the ball by switching to the “safe” Democrat campaign book. They didn’t go out to speak to the people where they were at town halls like Walz said in the article, they didn’t have firebrand Walz shining a flashlight on how bizarre Trump’s people are, they didn’t have a message that would excite the people and really shake up a statue quo that was slowly and inexorably draining Americans of their economic prospects. They just played the safe Democrat game of incrementalism and subservience to wealth and power rather than the people.

        Obviously Walz didn’t say all this, but I think the “safety” he refers to absolutely refers to Kamala’s campaign adhering too closely to a traditional campaign style that was not going to win them much enthusiastic support.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Whereas I’m taking walz more literally. In my experience, they came out swinging, full of energy and novelty, getting that “weird” label stuck. I can even understand lack of policy or platform since apparently we no longer care about that.

          … but then they started answering “no change”, the energy faded, they dropped out of the news. I don’t know if it’s just me, but they were invisible leading up to the election. Literally more concerned about not screwing up, playing it safe.

          It’s not that Harris’ campaigne adhered too closely to a traditional campaign style, but that they let up on the gas approaching the finish line

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, that’s exactly what he meant. They stuffed Walz in a box and paraded around with the Cheneys the moment they got that endorsement. They played safe by playing to the center when they started strong by picking one of the most progressive governors for VP.

        • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Well, Trump and the GOP are working to make sure Palestinians aren’t going to be an issue any more. By helping Israel genocide them.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well they have a long way to go to eclipse Bidens support of racist genocide, but I’m sure they’ll try hard.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Trump and the GOP aren’t just helping, they’re investing in the Palestinian extinction and planning to build golf resorts on their graves.

            • Ledericas@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Jared kushner, and trump already have real estate planned in the area.

      • AugustWest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I enjoyed your comment for a few reasons, but have one question. Did you pick Dearborn Michigan at random off a mental map, or was there some specific reason for that city in particular?

        • ravinggerbil@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Dearborn is frequently spoken about in conservative circles as “being taken over by Muslims.” Maybe that has something to do with it.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            michigan has a large muslim population, and dearborn is one of thier strongholds. i dont think michigan went to trump though. i said on reddit before coming here, that the gaza/ issue isnt that big of impact because most americans arnt that concerned about foreign policy, as they are about INFLATION, and social issues in the usa.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            re: @AugustWest@lemmy.world

            That’s why, yes. Big Somali ex-pat community. Sort of like how Columbus, OH got dumped on with the “They’re eating the dogs and the cats” line because older white residents were panicking at the influx of Haitians working the gradually renewing manufacturing sector.

        • pachrist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think it is the city in the US with the highest percentage of Arab Americans. But also maybe there’s a bit of oil there.

  • deadkennedy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    yeah that’s one way to put it.

    2024 was not an election to play it safe or take the high road, yet every chance the DNC collectively got, they did just that.

    They should have slung mud and gotten nasty.

    • Viskio_Neta_Kafo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Democrats always take the high road or the decorum path every chance they get. It’s one of the reasons why they loose the power struggle so much.

      Democrats and playing chess by the rules and Republicans are moving the pieces wherever they want as long as they can get away with it.

      The Democrats could have delayed ACB being put on the supreme Court untill election time but they actively decided not to do so.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Democrats always take the high road or the decorum path every chance they get.

        Not every chance. They run against progressives in primaries sometimes. Then the gloves come off.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Democrats always take the high road or the decorum path every chance they get.

        They do not

        They really do not

        They truly do not

        They absolutely do not

        This theory that Dems don’t play dirty is such a bald faced lie. Its rooted in the mythos of the party as an organization of high minded intellectuals and squishy naive good-natured hippies. But anyone who has gone through the trenches of a Dem primary or even bothered to recall the fine details of a general election, know this to be utterly false.

        Dems are more than happy to smear their opponents as anti-American, even to the point of accusing them of outright treason. Liberal media orgs and influencers regularly advance personal attacks on their opponents’ personal lives (Obama himself won his Illinois Senate seat on the back of the incumbent’s infidelity), parade around “body language experts” and other hockey pseudo-scientists to degrade the reputation of the opposition, and outright fabricate claims (the Steele Dossier “pee tape” being the liberal companion to the conservatives’ “Whitey Tape” from four years prior) for the entertainment of a gullible base.

        The Democrats could have delayed ACB plbeing but on the supreme Court untill election time but they actively decided not to do so.

        The Dems could have put a Senator at the head of the Judiciary Committee that wasn’t drooling her way through the hearing. But Feinstein’s cemented position as senior California Senator was the result of the exact kind of cut-throat politics that has entrenched horrifyingly corrupt and incompetent politicians from Henry Cueller to Joe Manchin.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The first link is about a pro Israel PAC spending money against the Dems, so I’m not sure how relevant that is?

          Of the others, the newest article is from 2019.

          This is pretty tame compared to what their opposing party does, I’m not sure this is supporting your argument to the extent you want. Even Watergate is tame compared to most of the shit republicans have pulled since Obama won. I suppose you could cherry pick metrics, but honestly none of this is even bad enough to be compared to what republicans have done this week. They’re not saints, sure, but if your waiting to vote for a saint you might want to get a job as a Cardinal.

          Your second link talks about an anti-trump strategy from the Clinton campaign that literally tried to highlight how stupid and vulgar he was, which only backfired because that’s what his supporters like about him

          The third link is attempting to conflate some random hoax videos with the rumors of a “kompromat” pee tape putin supposedly had/has an trump, which doesn’t really have much to do with the Dems that I can tell.

          The fourth link is about two Hillary supporters in 2016 admitting they spread the birther rumor, which again has what to do with the Dem party?

          Yeah, of all of these, I guess the Clinton one is relevant, and yeah, everyone has long since agreed that was a terrible strategy, but I’m not sure how any of this is a smoking gun that, what, Dems are as bad as Republicans? I’m not really sure what point you’re trying to make.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The first link is about a pro Israel PAC spending money against the Dems

            A Dem aligned group, in a Dem primary, to support AIPAC friendly candidates by running smears on progressive incumbents

            an anti-trump strategy from the Clinton campaign that literally tried to highlight how stupid and vulgar he was

            She used campaign resources to promote Trump during the GOP primary

            attempting to conflate some random hoax videos

            Propagated by Dem proxies to promote a liberally endorsed false claim

            two Hillary supporters in 2016 admitting they spread the birther rumor

            Two campaign staffers

    • jabeez@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not even nasty, just play ads of Fatputin spewing his idiotic/fascist nonsense non-stop, that would do it. There’s practically a never ending well of content from the last decade they could have used to make some truly devastating ad (grab 'em by the pussy, on a loop??), and how about going back and talking about his 1st term that ended in a year so bad it was a running joke? Nah, let’s talk about joy and leave it at some vague notion of this guy sucks, but not going into why. A coup attempt? Meh, we’ll show a clip of J6, but not bother mentioning it was a fucking coup attempt. Twice impeached convicted felon? Meh, let’s just leave it at some vague “not going back” slogan. Fucking malpractice. Again. Dems are either breathtakingly incompetent, or in cahoots.

      • KingPangolin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        And beyond that, democrats should have blast ads every 5 minutes about how George bush and trump both left us with the greatest recessions since the Great Depression. Bust the weird, non factual myth that republicans are good for the economy. Flip the script, the facts are there, they just suck ass at messaging and propaganda.

        • jabeez@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          For sure, the well is endless, but instead they insist on believing the fairy tale that what people REALLY want, despite voting to the contrary every single fucking time, is bipartisanship and a party that chooses “they go low we go high” as a rallying cry. Let’s instead try and help rehab GWB and Darth Cheney, the guys who had worst terrorist attack in US history on their watch, followed by lying us into a war that cost untold billions and lives, ending in the worst financial collapse in almost 100 years. I’m old enough to remember Harry “keep our powder dry” Reid and Nancy “impeachment is off the table” Pelosi being my first real awakening to just how unwilling dems are to actually fucking fight the fascists, instead choosing time and again to do nothing or even help them. Working great, just need MORE of it, then it’ll work for sure! Just like tax cuts and deregulation, has turned out just great, just need it a little bit more and it will start working, honest!

    • Lenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Shorter sentences, bolder statements, hell, they needed to say things that didn’t entirely make sense when you analyzed them, but sounded cool. Political campaigns clearly need to be more approachable, more relatable than what the Dems are doing. Look at AOC, Bernie, and JC, THAT is the messaging that resonates.

      Also, way more calls to action. What are YOU doing and what should I do? And stop asking me for damn money - you can invoice me when the work is complete.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    If by safe you mean ignoring your constituents and only listening to your wealthy contemporaries. Then yes you were too safe.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you read the article, that’s EXACTLY what he means. They told him the reason for this is that they could avoid “Having any public gaffees”

      The idea is that by just not being Trump they were “Ahead”, and any public misstep would put Trump in the lead.

      Walz now believes he and Harris were “never ahead” and it was arrogance that lead to them thinking they were the “Default Choice” for America

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which makes the second time the Democrats lost to Trump by believing they were the default choice. Even after being roundly criticized for it the first time. I’m starting to think they may not be smarter than me.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh it gets worse, they thought they were teh “default choice” because they got the people behind Hillary’s campaign to “help”

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Plus the one time it didn’t abjectly fail, it took a worldwide pandemic and mass death to happen. Their hubris is at a legendary level.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Democrat politicians should level with you all. Politicians need a tremendous amount of money to stay viable. They only answer to their donors and they get donors only if they can accomplish their goals which they do with the support of their constituents. They don’t just support their constituents out of feel good stuff. Republicans give them a free pass to do whatever they want. So they get lots of donors. The left groups do not do what they want so they don’t get donors. We’re fucked.

      Look into how many call centers are around Washington. They’re all call centers for the different politicians. They’re calling donors 24/7 trying to get more funding. All the time. The Reason leftist do not get anywhere, we don’t generate money

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Democrat politicians should level with you all. Politicians need a tremendous amount of money to stay viable.

        democrats massively outraised trump in 2024 and lost anyway. Turns out, you need votes too.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Leftists don’t generate money on the top line. The fact that actual leftist policy would create a utopian society where everyone is prosperous is completely an afterthought, and that’s because the economic system is run by a bunch of giant babies with zero impulse control or sense of delayed gratification.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look into how many call centers are around Washington. They’re all call centers for the different politicians. They’re calling donors 24/7 trying to get more funding. All the time. The Reason leftist do not get anywhere, we don’t generate money

        Well yeah, most of them refuse to take corporate money and SuperPAC donations. They don’t do insider trading when in office because they have consistent morals and ethics.

        Also helps when they corporations who own the media refuse to cover you and your wins, and then pay for the milquetoast candidates who won’t tax them to win more.