• Luke@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “People often say to me, ‘You don’t pay the authors. You don’t pay the reviewers. You hardly print anymore. The Web is free. Why do you charge?’” said H. Frederick Dylla, the former director of the American Institute of Physics and board member of the Association of American Publishers. “It sounds like a compelling argument. But it actually isn’t.”

    Albert Greco, a publishing expert at Fordham University who is working on a book about scholarly publishing, said those making that argument are forgetting everything they learned or should have learned in economics class.

    “There are costs,” he said. “Does The Washington Post have a paywall?”

    Yes.

    “So is it fair then if some high-school student wants to really follow the Supreme Court and doesn’t have the money to pay?” Greco said. “Life is a bitter mystery. We can’t give everything away for free. It’s not that kind of country.”

    These assholes don’t even have a better reason for fleecing everyone than base greed, and they don’t try to hide it.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      7 days ago

      The existence of publishers for scientific literature is completely unnecessary in the modern era. They exist only to make profits to continue their existence. They don’t actually provide value anymore when research institutions can just conduct peer review and then let researchers self-publish.

      They create negative value (a bottleneck) by limiting who can access research for just… aggregating and hosting articles.

      • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        wouldn’t it be funny if I slapped in a few ssds into an old desktop I found on the side of the road and hosted the entirety of human knowledge from it

    • 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 days ago

      ‘You don’t pay the authors. You don’t pay the reviewers.

      We can’t give everything away for free. It’s not that kind of country.

      Instead, he just takes everything from authors and reviewers for free. Is he living in a different country?

    • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      economics class

      which is absolute ideology anyhow

      “Does The Washington Post have a paywall?”

      wow, you’re using the everyone else is doing it argument. These are fucking children

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah lmao, that’s the worst possible argument he could give I think

      “Have you forgotten your economics class?” And then compared public research to a private newspaper

      Like, lmao

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Elbakyan is an immeasurably more virtuous, noble and honorable person than these Dylla and Greco worms.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Does this for profit news agency require money for information? Then surely academic research needs to require money to get the info as well! Nevermind that public funds are involved with a lot of research initially where news orgs don’t have that, we need to make a profit cuz reasons!”

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      “Life is a bitter mystery. We can’t give everything away for free. It’s not that kind of country.”

      Tautology School Degree. Why not?

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I could almost sympathize when it came to paper publishing. Because the cost to publish was high, and not a lot of people buying. But now with electronic formats, yeah, they are total assholes in the current sense.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    7 days ago

    As someone in science that has used this many times, I can’t emphasize enough how much this has accelerated research in the modern era. I am so grateful for her work.

    • Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fr. After I graduated I was cut off from access to scientific literature, which is a major blow when trying to keep up in ones field.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      A huge aspect of this also is that it disproportionately benefits academics and students in parts of the world where there is less institutional access to journal subscriptions. That is to say that SciHub has been a significant force for democratising knowledge and countering historic inequities.

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yep, I just found out about it recently because I was doing research on a project. I had heard, but never explored or looked into, sci-hub. I had no idea about it. I don’t know how I missed it all of these years!

        • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, I was bummed to find out it’s no longer updated. But there are so many articles that it’s still helpful and great. And she still is holding the flame by keeping it up. I’m checking out libgen right now actually.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Stealing profits that are already made by stealing? Yeah, I have no sympathy for that.

        Tax payers already pay for this shit through federal funding of the sciences, just for the publishers to turn around and steal people’s time and money to view and peer review them. Publishers are thieves, so they can go fuck themselves.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I agree, If the research was funded by the government; then the research belongs to the people.

          Publishers and corporations is why IP laws are so fucked up beyond recognition.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    You see, the problem, publishers, is that your “business” should not have been a business in the first place.

    • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      I get so pissed when I think about Aaron Swartz. He was a bit before his time. I’d love it if here were still around. There would be so much more people rallying behind him these current times.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I was telling a friend about him the other day. She said she found it odd how it seems like he became a martyr for his ideals, in that the way that he is remembered is almost like he’s a mythological figure, more ideal than man. I agreed with her that the loss of humanity due to such a high profile death is tragic, but that it wasn’t the internet who turned him into a martyr, but the FBI (and whoever else was pushing for his prosecution).

        They threw the book at Aaron Schwartz because they wanted to set a precedent. They wanted to turn him into a symbol, and that led to his death. I’m proud of how the internet rallied around him and made him into a different kind of symbol, but like you, I feel sad to think about what could have been if he hadn’t been killed (I know that he died by suicide, but saying that he “died” felt too passive). It sucks that he’s just a part of history now.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    While it’s true that publishers do something of value, the amount they charge is absurd.

    What makes it even worse is that so many of the people involved are donating their labour. It reminds me of college sports in the US. The actual people doing the work, the athletes, are forced to do it for free. Meanwhile, a few select groups: coaches, TV networks, etc. are making huge amounts of money.

    • dissipatersshik@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yeah, I have no problem with people being compensated for their work.

      The problem is that the discussion usually ends at “compensation” and never includes “how much?” Useful idiots believe that whatever price is charged is always fair and necessary, which is sad.

      In a system literally built around the amount of money we have, we sure do like to believe that magnitude doesn’t matter.