• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    some poor company’s AI

    Fuck you, those bastards have billions of dollars and zero ethics. Let them eat a great big bucket of salt.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Random philosophical question - If Sam Altman is billions in debt, is he richer, or poorer than us? I know it’s a silly, mostly rhetorical question, but for whatever reason my brain found the idea interesting

      • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Elementary, my dear Watson.

        If he faces the consequences for his actions, he is poor. If he has people to do that for him, he is rich.

        Wealth is measured in power and sway in capitalist society, not cash. If you can write a check to a lobbyist to get them to change a bill for you that you never voted on or participated in congress to enact, you are rich.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That means it’s infected EVERYBODY’s searches. And everybody is cheering, as if peeing in the pool is ethically pure behavior now. Or do people not understand that AI uses the exact same data we do?

    • Kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That page is very obviously satire. We can’t remove humor from the Internet just because LLMs don’t get it.

      But this is an interesting test case to see how ‘gullible’ these machines are to fake news. I personally can’t judge if OP’s example gives us any information. Is there a canonical answer to in-utero Sith probing?