• OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    Remember when the Obama administration tried to ease off this silly non-sense with Cuba. That’s how you know this issue is living inside of Trump’s head.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Because a few big landowners and the mafia got kicked out of Cuba in 1959 and they’ve paying off politicians to steal it back ever since.

  • speckofrust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was in Cuba again this year. People there are really hurting. The streets of Havana are the emptiest of tourists I’ve ever seen them, yet the Paseo del Prado is alive with socialising Cubans every single night, persevering in the face of the soulless, shameless, compassionless behemoth next door.

    May the Cuban people prevail regardless of the governments who use them as pawns.

  • D_Tom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    With Trump’s military, I would be hesitant to invade a deserted island at this point. We might lose.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I guess the new Congress is just going to need to defund the executive branch.

  • savvie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The Cuban Embassy in Washington, D.C., estimated on Thursday that the cost of the U.S. blockade to Cuba between March 2025 and February 2026 amounted to $8 billion.

    Earlier this month, the Treasury Department imposed further sanctions on Cuban oil tankers and shipping companies and threatened to target any international entity or person doing business within its marine or maritime industries as part of a push “to end the Cuban regime’s malign activities, both in Cuba and across our hemisphere.”

    Cuba’s Embassy in Washington, D.C., said these steps “deepen an energy siege that already leaves hospitals without reliable power and families facing blackouts. The blockade is not targeted at a government. It is collective punishment that hits ordinary people every day.”

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If incoming Democrats don’t stop this, then they never deserve to be voted for ever again

    • codydodd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Careful. There is a movement right now to begin blaming democrats for everything even though MAGA still has its disgusting grip on decision making.

      This article is about Trump threatening to use his executive powers. He is going to try to do things neither houses are used to seeing a president do. He is going to challenge precedent and rules as he already has. Yet you are already blaming democrats.

      I agree though that the democrats are in a delicate position where they have to root the centrists out of the party. But thats not what this article is about.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you look through my history, you’ll see that I’m well aware and have been actively arguing against those people.

        At some point, however, you have to stop falling for it. They need to fix shit (or at the very least, attempt it earnestly) or else I’m done.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I get the worry here, but that is why we voted for them. This is the exact kind of thing I expect them to stop. Demanding the things you actually want from your representatives is not wrong.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Are you arguing for not holding the Dem party accountable for it’s action or inaction? If there are no legislative blocks even tried, that’s a bad sign. Yes, we need to root out centrists, but we also have to have votes to identify them, and Jeffries and Schumer know that.

        • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          All the newly elected haven’t even been sworn in yet and won’t be until after New Years. Slow your roll, the R’s are still in charge for a few more months.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sure, happy to wait. But so far Jeffries looks poised to be Speaker, and that’s a bad sign we should be agitating about. I don’t see any reason to take the pressure off and I certainly don’t want to be accussed of being a MAGA plant because I want Democrats to actually deliver on an agenda of real change.

            • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              We all want Democrats to deliver, and we absolutely should hold their feet to the fire for every failure to do so. It has to be reasonable criticism though. Right now the Dems couldn’t pass a fart. That changes when they actually have the butts in seats to make a difference. Jeffries is a problem, but it looks like Schumer may be replaceable and that’s not nothing.

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Yes, the comment that started this was, “If Democrats don’t stop this [invasion of Cuba], they should never run for anything again.” (or something, the comment’s behind this pop up editting window.

                I think the problem with that criticism isn’t that it is criticism. It’s obviously phrased as an IF-THEN thing… my problem with it is it’s punishing Democrats for not effectively stopping an authoritarian president on a power congress has spent 50 years abdicating to the executive… that’s kinda a high bar. My edit would be “If Democrats don’t make significant attempts to stop this …”

                At the same time, I think cutting the military budget to the bone is absolutely the only way they can stop the war in Iran, and you can bet there will emaciated troops on Fox news every day explaining the Democrats are starving them … but it is what people overwhelmingly voted for, so if you want to stop a war, guys, this is the only way to do it, and that’s gonna take some chutzpah.

                • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 minutes ago

                  Fair enough. Although you could also take money from the pentagon, and back-door in a program through a different department to support the soldiers. Maybe send them big checks with “Democrats support the troops” on them.