• scintilla@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Actually I don’t have to be ok with anyone contributing to the burning down of the planet. I feel like adults should have a better understanding of morality than simply “its against the rules and is therefore wrong”.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think most people don’t really develop moral reasoning past “I don’t want to get punished” or, if you’re lucky, “it’s against the rules.”

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      No man what are you doing! We already used the “well actually it’s bad because uhhh climate change” argument against cryptocurrencies, you can’t double-dip like! When you hate on AI you’re supposed to use the “but it’s plagiarism” argument! Everyone knows that!

      • Luffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        OK then

        1. It is bad for the climate
        2. Its plagiarism
        3. We are literally putting our means of expressing ourselves into the hands of a few people. So once they just decide that cats are now not allowed, no one will be able to create memes about cats
        4. You are fueling a machine that google is selling to the genocide in Gaza.
        5. You will never be able to create new things. Since an AI only has relatively few nodes that are random (so it can output different things when given the same input) let’s say about 10% of your picture is actually new, and the rest plagiarised. You could just input that again and make it more random, but inputting something AI generated into an AI just makes it shit itself, it will not be „random” like an artist thinks about making a new way of expressing themselves”,but random as in „let’s just expose a drive to extreme radiation and see what the data looks like after 1000 bitflips
        6. The data collection. If a normal human collected that much data about me I could just sue them for stalking
          • Luffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?

            Also it dosent change any point except 2

            • renzev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              So you want to buy me and every about like 10 million people a server that can run a halfway good LLM Model and pay the electric bills?

              No, that sounds expensive

              Also it dosent change any point except 2

              It does actually

              • Luffy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                No, that sounds expensive

                OK, so you just want everyone to just pull 20k out of their ass to buy themselves hardware to run a LLM on?

                It does actually

                Tell me how.

                • renzev@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  49 minutes ago

                  Whoa there buddy the post was talking about image generators, which run OK on consumer (albeit high-end) hardware. You’re the one who brought up LLMs.

                  And how can google track me if it’s a thing running locally? Just pass --network=none to the docker container lol. Even then you’re arguably giving google more useful data by using gmail than any of their AI services. Do you go after every gmail user telling them that they’re supporting genocide? As for your fifth point, gauging whether or not something is original art by the permutation space of the medium is reductive. Is a base guitar less expressive than a harp because the musician is limited by the number of strings? Humans make art for many reasons, and one of those reasons is because its fun. Drawing with pencils can be fun, painting can be fun, writing prompts can be fun. People will keep on having AI art competitions because it’s fun while you’re sitting there in the corner seething about how all of them are genocide supporters. inb4 ad hominem, but honestly you sound insufferable.