• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’ll try to shove you off the platform with constant negativity and trying to act like Trump is just a continuation of all the same. If you didn’t care before, why do you care now?

    It’s not. It’s different.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I remember 2004, a friend had come back to our home town for new years, and in our fave local pub, he regaled us with stories of what it was like working with Trump. He told us about what a joke of a played narcissist he is, being primed by his psychopathic handlers for a puppet presidency. … It seemed absurd, implausible even, for about a decade.

      I heard recently they were planning on having Charlie Kirk become president in the distant future too… until he grew sense and conscience. Imagine if each of their puppets attain consciousness and conscientiousness… and they have no puppets left to deceive us with… :D

      Imagine if USA had democracy. Cleared up all the election rigging, the fixed proprietary voting machines, the lobbying, the gerrymandering, the electoral college, the voter suppression, the bought corporate media, etc, etc, etc. Imagine if the people in USA got to vote for what they want, not merely under duress to vote against who they don’t want.

      Imagine if it were real…

      • MediumGray@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        So for fucks sake pick the one that’s slower at it so you have more time to do something about it. It’s not like voting locks you out of any other actions.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s no use asking these people to do any kind of direct action. They think abstaining once every four years will bring an end to capitalism. They’ll never attend a protest or vote in a primary, much less pick up a gun for the revolution.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The ones who are going to do more are already doing more, and both-sidesing the ones who aren’t is just going to make them do even less. Just let them help with slowing the descent down a bit, that’s the most they’re going to do anyway. It buys time for the ones who are doing something to do something.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. I personally believe the election is going to be stolen, but nobody should fucking do the job FOR them. Voting MIGHT work, and you can still prepare for ridiculous, shortsighted guerilla fantasies after taking a day to go TRY the easy solution.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “But they’ll steal the elections!!!”

      LOL. Yup. That’s the crux of the terror that knocks people out of their considerate, critical, creative forebrain, and pushes them into their reactive social-dominating survival-focused fearful limbic reflex where they’re easier to control.

      This time, America… stop falling for it. :) We can still mend this.

      Fascism only wins if you just give up and let it.

      And so don’t fall for the false dichotomies. ;D

      More than voting may be required. And that does not mean badgering your fellow Americans into deeper divisive groupthink. :)

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    One should vote, it simply shouldn’t be the end of it.

    If you voted Democrat and thought you made your part, wrong. You barely made one shift towards one slightly less terrible group. This is not victory. A part of what you should do, yes. All you should do - not.

      • Digit@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Republicans also really love when you vote third party.

        (Or Democrat party too, depending on where the votes are being taken from)

        Until enough people do, and sufficient votes are taken from the purple party, that they lose.

        … But then, may also need to mend all the lobbying, gerymandering, voter suppression, rigged voting machines, electoral college, etc first/simultaneously.

        Imagine if the people in USA got a system that helped them vote for what they want, not against who they don’t want. Imagine… :)

        • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Until enough people do, and sufficient votes are taken from the purple party, that they lose.

          Nope, you utterly miss the point. First past the post means that Republicans win when the anti-fascist vote is split.

          If you don’t like the current candidates of the Democrat party, then go vote in the Democrat primary.

          Imagine if the people in USA got a system that helped them vote for what they want, not against who they don’t want. Imagine… :)

          There is this little thing called “objective reality”. First past the post sucks, but it is objective reality. You should try taking it into account, some time.

          • Digit@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nope. Did not miss your point at all. You seemed to miss mine, and doubled down.

            • GraniteM@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I remember when Gore lost Florida, and therefore the country, because less than one tenth of one percent of voters thought a protest vote for Nader was a good idea. In primaries and in smaller elections, sure, give third party votes a try. But the bigger the election, the more it converges on a choice between the two major parties, and one of them is worse than the other.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That doeant mean you have to get on one of the two major busses. It’s completely fine to pick a third smaller bus. It might take longer to arrive, but it doesn’t smell like someone pissed on the seat.

  • Hiplobbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Both sides are bad” is correct, but perpetuate the notion that you only can vote on the two different parties. There are other parties you can vote on.

    “Literally the only way to stay in power”, do I need to remind OP that they WON the elections? Democracy goes both ways, your “side” doesn’t always win.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I usually see it as calling out the political capture of the two-party system which has rendered the United States an oligarchy with increasingly dysfunctional democratic functions. Quite often it is a call out of the partisanship that reinforces the rigidity of the two party system and preventing any positive or lasting reform. At the very least those are the valid contexts I know of for bringing up any both-sideism of the two American political parties.

    But yes, the Republicans do win when there is less voting.

  • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    One of Propagandas goals is to get you to give up. Uncovering truths and doing research is hard according to Josh Johnson, if it was easy more of us would do it instead of watching memes. Propaganda is designed to flood you with so much crap that you question everything and then give up looking for the truth because its hard. Ai has not helped this.

    https://youtu.be/srr0rRgF2Fw

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      question everything and then give up looking

      ?

      Why the second part?

      Why not just remain questioning everything?

      Propaganda is designed to flood you with so much crap that…

      … that you [in the current form of propaganda] start to believe the truth is unknowable, because of all the lies in all directions at once. This primes you to give up [on truth and democracy], and seek a totalitarian/fascist strongman to save you.

      Carry on questioning everything. Cannot have a fully informed public without educated minds. The mark of an educated mind is the ability to entertain an idea without necessarily accepting nor rejecting it.

      Deploying non-belief may decouple you from susceptibility to such psyop propaganda.

      We can still mend this.

      (Also +1 Josh Johnson, probably my fave comedian these days.).

      • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Probably just poor phrasing on my part.

        The video I posted goes into more about how propaganda in the form of flooding you with to much info works and the problems that AI is adding to it.

        • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It wasn’t poor phrasing, friend. It’s exactly correct.

          People absolutely give up. They give up because the truth is depressing and the lies are depressing and it’s exhausting trying to police our politicians’ corruptions and the media is complicit and it all seems hopeless.

          It’s easier to just put your head in the sand until trouble knocks on your door. And the sad truth is that people will continue to eat shit until there’s nothing left to eat at all. Only then, when they are hungry and cold and scared, will they finally stand up and be angry.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    No, the point is to agitate you against an establishment that wants to prevent you from having a better choice.

    Liberals who are passionately defending lesser evil electoralism before primaries have even started are either idiots in denial or moderates who don’t want to talk about why their party is nearly as unpopular as Trump.

  • dumbass@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, you dumb fuck Americans should have voted for Vermin Supreme.

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I refuse to stop shit talking democrats, if they weren’t absolutely complicit warmongers we wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nobody is saying not to shit talking them, people are saying that nuance is needed. We need to push for better representatives. BUT. When the general election happens, we need to vote Democrat because REPUBLICANS ARE FUCKING FASCISTS. Because while both sides suck, both sides do not suck equally. So shit talk your Democrats, as long as you shit talk your Republicans even more. Or do they get a pass because you write them off as evil?

      Does your shit talking drive people away from voting for Democrats when the vote is Dem vs Repub? If so, you support fascism. Plain and simple.

      Put your energy into change where it matters: Primaries, other offices, pushing society back to the left away from fascism. Make sure you’re not helping the fascists win.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The OP meme is not calling for nuance, it’s saying that if you’re shittalking democrats you’re helping Republicans win.

        My democrat state rep sucks and is in practice a thinly-veiled Republican coasting on incumbency and people not investigating beyond the ‘D’

        My federal rep (D) has been actively complicit in perpetuating the genocide in Palestine and allowing Trump to walk all over Venezuela. I actually put in a lot of effort with antiwar groups to try to sway them in the past. What I learned is that when it comes to war and empire if they want to climb the ranks in DC they’re going to tow the line.

        Open Republicans are obviously worse, but theyre also a non factor in my state, they just run for ‘nonpartisan’ seats or pose as democrats. This is also why i chaff at vote-bluers, they will act like challenging an incumbent ‘democrat’ who sucks is somehow helping Republicans

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        What do you mean how so?

        The democrats are prolific warmongers, they just think they’re smarter about it than Republicans.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            If they weren’t prolific warmongers and instead did things that were actually popular at home then they would probably be seen as more trustworthy and not lost to Trump repeatedly, idk how more to spell it out for you

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you are form the US, you are having your primaries by now.

    Those are the ones where good people appear and need your vote to stay on the race. Go participate there, instead of complaining about the main election.

    • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the correct answer.

      The people who support the “both sides bad” argument and the “protest non-voters” are children who still need their parents to order their tendies for them at Chili’s.

      • Get involved.
      • Understand the actual candidates.
      • Vote in the primaries.

      The general election should be the last step in executing your civic duties and by that time you should be voting for your team.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    This post is designed to keep people voting for the purple party.

    Look around the world. Most places [have systems that] do not succumb to this corrupt harmful stupidity.

    Vote and organise harder around independents and “3rd party” candidates. Especially any seeking to implement proportional representation, ranked choice voting, direct democracy, etc. Double especially for any seeking to eliminate the various layers of corruption in the democratic system, such as proprietary voting machines, voter suppression, the electoral college, lobbying, gerrymandering, etc.

    And most of all… stop falling for it.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Your suggestion works for local/state elections. It does not work for presidential elections and won’t anytime in the foreseeable future.

      When it comes to the presidential election, you are voting Republican, Democrat, or acknowledging you are fine with the worse case scenario.

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Now the question is which is easier, convincing millions of people to vote for “anyone not a republican” or convincing a candidate to be more than “not republican”

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, primaries are around now. It’s a great time for that!

      Participate in primaries. THIS is the election you want for that.

      • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Depends on where you are. My state doesn’t have primaries till August and by then it’s basically already decided.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Same here, most primary candidate drop out before I even get my mail in ballot. Also there hasnt been a fair primary in 12 years so like so for over a decade party direction has been at the mercy of quid pro quo backroom deals, or straight up just appointing a candidate. Why would the next one suddenly be a fair representation of the will of voters?

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      You mean Republican, right?

      ;)

      Same as Democrats are not democratic, Republicans are not republican. ;)

      Hard work undoing the newspeek this deep into the Orwellian hole.

      • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Past, you should probably read that book you’re quoting.

        Newspeak was the idea that removing words from people’s vocabulary would remove the thoughts from their head, therefore becoming an avenue for control. Despite the Sapir-Worf hypothesis being bunked, I don’t think it was at the time.

        What words were they removing from your vocabulary, how do you believe it is controling you? Modern examples would be something like ‘Unalive’ I guess, but not really. Sponsors trying to get you stop using the word dead, and talking about death. But, unalive is a work around, not enforced, so not really newspeak.