“You Know Who” wrote this:
The White House considers anyone that uses the term, “Artificial Intelligence,” as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, “Super Intelligence,” THE ENEMY! President DONALD J. TRUMP
I wonder. Does that made this community a terrorist organization?
Eh, I’m already considered a terrorist for believing workers should have democracy at work. Nothing special
Same but I think women should have body antonymy and all humans deserve the same rights as any other human.
I don’t think I follow. I’m an anarcho-syndicalist, the government has explicitly called all anarchists terrorists. I know people in the Minnesota 15, some are anarchists, some are unionists, all are anticapitalist.
For real, I was a really bad boy before it was cool!
If trump doesn’t consider you an enemy at this point, you’re a terrible person.
Yeah, Trump and/or his family are definitely domain-squatting a bunch of Slovenian TLD domain names that they’re hoping to sell for gorillions of dollars in their latest grift. Slovenia’s TLD is the
.siTLD.- Continuing to insist on “SI” of “AI”.
- The way he decided on “Super Intelligence” was from a Truth Social poll where the options were “Super Intelligence”, “Supreme Intelligence”, and “Superior Intelligence”, all of which have the initials “SI”.
- And Melania’s Slovenian.
When I first heard someone say the reason for the “SI” thing was that Trump was domain name squatting, it was conjecture. But more and more, everything he does makes it sound like there’s no other reasonable explanation for how weird he’s acting about it.
More like Smegma Intelligence but I don’t want to insult smegma.
Slop Intelligence obvs. Or imbecilligence?
Embelligence, because theyre always telling us it’s infinitely better than it actually is
This is too stupid to be their grift.
This carries risk, squatting isn’t cheap, and there’s zero momentum.
They prefer dumbass shit that involves tricking his base.
I believe it’s as simple as Trump making it even easier to find out who his followers are. Trumpers say one thing out of loyalty, everyone else says the other. If you’re casually talking to a stranger, you’ll instantly know what they believe when they mention Trump’s phrase. Similarly, Trumpers can use the phrase to quickly show they’re on the same side.
Always a grift. Every action. His entire life. He embodies the word “grifter” better than any other person I’ve ever seen or heard of. He’s pure, unfiltered, raw trash.
Oh, there were go. Just more insider trading/self dealing type bullshit.
We can’t even say “AI” anymore? This cancel culture, super-woke bullshit is out of control. /s
Nothing says “highly accepted” like having to threaten people into using that idiocy.
I don’t like this “tax the bourgeoisie” stuff, it’s giving social democrat, and like, this obviously cannot be accomplished legally through the state, it’ll just never be allowed to happen legally. The premise of no taxes, but for billionaires already is advocating for overthrowing the government and creating a new one, because there’s just no other way to accomplish such a thing. If we can do that, then how about we just don’t have billionaires or millionaires. This is just a convoluted way of saying we should seize the means of production and put them in the control of a worker’s state, BUT THROUGH TAXES, so you don’t have to mention socialism.
What I love about this is that the senile orange fart bag will almost certainly forget his decree in the next few days and go back to calling it AI himself.
I’m already considered an enemy for being an advocate of human rights. I’m a just continue to call it LLMs or generative models as appropriate.
I probably am for advocating for Trump to be Luigied.
Too quick.
I want him found of his crimes and spending his last days in prison without access to yesmen and social media.
Thats a nice thought but lets be realistic. That wont happen.
My preferred fate for him is prion disease, like CJD. He would clearly see that a very painful end is coming, and very soon, and there’s nothing he can do to stop it.
“Highly accepted”
Man, they don’t make halogen projectors that strong anymore.
Use the correct term: LLMs.
Fucking die already dude
What a joyous day that will be.
This is a distraction, you all should care much more about the fact that he’s working with one of the architects of project 2025 to steal the midterms
Newspeak was the official language of
OceaniaThe United States of America and had been devised to meet the ideological needs ofIngsocMAGA, orEnglish SocialismAmerican Conservatism. In the year19842026 there was not as yet anyone who used Newspeak as his sole means of communication, either in speech or writing. The leading articles in ‘The Times’ were written in it, but this was a TOUR DE FORCE which could only be carried out by a specialist. It was expected that Newspeak would have finally superseded Oldspeak (or Standard English, as we should call it) by about the year 2050. Meanwhile it gained ground steadily, all Party members tending to use Newspeak words and grammatical constructions more and more in their everyday speech. The version in use in19842026, and embodied in the Ninth and Tenth Editions of the Newspeak Dictionary, was a provisional one, and contained many superfluous words and archaic formations which were due to be suppressed later. It is with the final, perfected version, as embodied in the Eleventh Edition of the Dictionary, that we are concerned here.The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of
IngsocMAGA, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought—that is, a thought diverging from the principles ofIngsocMaga—should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever. To give a single example. The word FREE still existed in Newspeak, but it could only be used in such statements as ‘This dog is free from lice’ or ‘This field is free from weeds’. It could not be used in its old sense of ‘politically free’ or ‘intellectually free’ since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with was allowed to survive. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to DIMINISH the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.From 1984 by George Orwell. Appendix: The Principles of Newspeak.
Available to read for free, here: https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100021h.html
He’s fucking nuts
Don’t link or send traffic to shitgibbon’s site.
